Return to Message Board
Posting a Follow-Up to
9/5/2013 1:20:18 PM
I haven't crunched the numbers on the results but it looks like a disproportionate number of the DNF's had to go back longer than one year for their qualifiers. A lot can change in two years. Good argument for shortening the qualifying period to make sure it's more relevant? Maybe make qualifiers that were on the peak valid for two years, and if you need to use a non-peak qualifier it has to be within the past year.
To prevent SPAM your e-mail will be kept hidden!
Include original message in response?
Get New Code
Enter Anti Robot Spam Code:
Return to Message